Surprising news:
Bush has a committee on ethics. And for such a scientifically forward-thinking President [sarcasm alert], he has a BIOethics Committee. This would be the group whispering in his ear that "the most egregious abuses of medical research" includes "creating human-animal hybrids"... one of his statements in the 2006 State of the Union Address.
More surprising news:
This Bioethics Committee (which has 23 members, four of which [Leon R. Kass, David Gelernter, Robert George, and Robert Kraynak] are "vociferous advocates of a central role for religion in morality and public life", while eleven more work for Christian institutions. Not in the 23? No life scientists, psychologists, anthropologists, sociologists, or even historians. BIO ethics.... and not a biologist in the bunch... great) this spring released a 555-page report entitled Human Dignity and Bioethics. Now this concept of human dignity is a pretty ambiguous thing, and to have it discussed in terms of science... well, that's frightening enough. But how it's discussed is truly scary:
So on the one hand, the “self-made” man or woman might gain in Dignity as a Quality from being the author (or co-author) of his or her own character and situation. Yet on the other hand, it is also possible that such a person instead gains in Un-Dignity from their self-remolding. The possibility of such Un-Dignity, or loss of Dignity as a Quality, is an important concern among some critics of human enhancement. Leon Kass puts it uncompromisingly:[The] final technical conquest of his own nature would almost certainly leave mankind utterly enfeebled. This form of mastery would be identical with utter dehumanization. Read Huxley's Brave New World, read C. S. Lewis's Abolition of Man, read Nietzsche's account of the last man, and then read the newspapers. Homogenization, mediocrity, pacification, drug-induced contentment, debasement of taste, souls without loves and longings—these are the inevitable results of making the essence of human nature the last project of technical mastery.
In other words, Kass says: don't make any attempt to better yourself... Maybe we're supposed to leave that to our "co-author"... uh, God?
Now this Leon Kass, he was the Chair of Bush's Bioethics Committee from 02-05 (in other words, to just before the "human-animal hybrid" remark). This guy's got some very interesting views...but before I get to them, I want to address this whole concept of "Un-Dignity"... Kass wants us to read Brave New World... may I suggest 1984? From a discussion of Orwell's concept of NewSpeak:
Newspeak contains no negative terms. For example, the only way to express the meaning of “bad” is through the word “ungood.” Something extremely bad is called “doubleplus ungood.”
Sounds a little like "Un-Dignity" to me... but I digress.
Back to this Kass guy.
In a discussion of stem cell research with Bill Moyers, to Moyer's question/statement, "You're letting science go." Kass responded:
Science goes. The question is whether the people's representatives on an issue of such deeply divided moral sentiment ought to pronounce by way of official judgment we approve of the destruction of nascent life for the sake of research. It's a boundary to be crossed. I'm not-- I have a lot of trouble with this.
In an essay entitled "The End of Courtship" he writes:
But most young women strike me as sad, lonely, and confused... Here is a (partial) list of the recent changes that hamper courtship and marriage: the sexual revolution, made possible especially by effective female contraception; the ideology of feminism and the changing educational and occupational status of women; the destigmatization of bastardy, divorce, infidelity, and abortion; the general erosion of shame and awe regarding sex...The supreme virtue of the virtuous woman was modesty, a form of sexual self-control, manifested not only in chastity but in decorous dress and manner, speech and deed, and in reticence in the display of her well- banked affections. A virtue, as it were, made for courtship, it served simultaneously as a source of attraction and a spur to manly ardor, a guard against a woman's own desires...
Man, if we here in a America were just a little MORE ashamed about sex (and if we could just get rid of that EFFECTIVE female contraceptive... and keep them broads dumb), this could be a great country! Misogynist much, Kass?
But if that was bad, then, brother, you haven't seen anything yet (and here the circle come full circle to this concept of human "un"dignity.
In an ENTIRE book entitled The Hungry Soul, he writes:
Worst of all from this point of view are those more uncivilized forms of eating, like licking an ice cream cone -- a catlike activity that has been made acceptable in informal America but that still offends those who know eating in public is offensive.... eating on the street -- even when undertaken, say, because one is between appointments and has no other time to eat -- displays in fact precisely such lack of self-control: This doglike feeding, if one must engage in it, ought to be kept from public view, where, even if WE feel no shame, others are compelled to witness our shameful behavior.
No licking... got that? [OK, gotta admit, a world without Gene Simmons... might not be a bad thing]
I can only assume Mrs. Kass is one un-satisfied woman.
I know I'm an unsatisfied citizen, knowing that guys like this have the President's ear...


